That’s a more interesting proposition than sticking to the rigid structure of an animated film for a second time. So why would Disney try once again to pull from an already-made film, especially one that has such a significantly lower fan base? With the original film’s story already told, The Lion King 2 has the potential to go in all-new directions and tell a new, modern story with an already stellar voice cast. The problem isn’t that 2019’s The Lion King is a bad movie, but rather that many see it as a bad (and unnecessary) remake.
#SIMBA THE LION KING 2 FULL MOVIE MOVIE#
Plus, the movie still pulled from the same timeless story that worked so well in the original. It was incredibly successful and managed to push the boundaries of what CGI is capable of, especially with regards to recreating animated worlds in a live-action way. So The Lion King 2 is a chance for Disney to get it right.Īll of this isn't to say The Lion King failed as a film. On top of that, what it did change didn't work for many people. The Lion King wasn't a proper remake, yet it also didn't do enough to differentiate itself. Furthermore, the 2019 movie's critical reception might force the sequel to take a more original route. There’s not enough spectacle, action, or emotional intrigue between the start and finish of Simba’s Pride. A story of young love between previously unestablished characters won’t be able to cut it if Disney is looking to repeat the 2019 Lion King’s $1.6 billion box office take. The most obvious reason the new movie won’t pull from Simba’s Pride is simply because the original sequel doesn’t have much to offer. Related: Why Disney Started Making So Many Live-Action Remakes But sadly, that won’t be enough to carry The Lion King 2. It’s cute, with a soundtrack that’s sadly forgettable, and a happy ending that reunites the Pride Lands. Simba’s Pride is a very simple movie it moves The Lion King’s Shakespearean inspiration from Hamlet to Romeo & Juliet, with a kid-friendly story of forbidden love between Simba and Nala’s daughter Kiara, and the heir to Scar’s exiled tribe, Kovu. For that, and a few other reasons, it likely won’t be much of a consideration for The Lion King 2. While the ‘90s follow-up was better than most of Disney’s slew of non-theatrical sequels of the day, it certainly wasn’t on the same level as the original film. I would highly recommend it.The Lion King 2is coming - but it probably won’t bear much resemblance 1998’s direct-to-video The Lion King II: Simba’s Pride. Its not simple and happy go lucky like most Disney sequels. thanks.) This sequel actually has depth and every (major) character in this movie has their own personal struggle. (for the record, toy story 2 is Disney and pixar-but is not Disney made. Its on par with Aladdin and the king of thieves, which is the only other excellent Disney sequel. The ending is a little flat as well, but its still a touching movie. Zira is excellent, and Kovu is very complex and interesting. Kiara, their daughter, is a little flat, But the evil villains are very, very good. Timoon and Puumba are still cute and funny. puke.) I'd say more of the problem is they kind of down play a lot of characters that had bigger roles. They didn't ruin anything from the first movie, like the characters personalities, as they do in so many other sequels (like little mermaid 2. Compared to the first movie, it isn't all that bad. Its one of the movies where the first time around its okay, and then if you see it again, you're like.wow, this is great! Same goes for the songs. The lion king 2 is probably my favorite Disney sequel.
0 kommentar(er)
